Biden’s decision to raid Trump’s Mar-a-Lago retreat backfires as a jury prepares to indict him.

Unelected operatives at President Joe Biden’s Department of Justice appear to dislike the concept of impartial oversight.

The FBI obtained a series of allegedly classified documents during an unprecedented raid on former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago clubhouse in Florida.

Trump’s team stated that the documents had been declassified. Furthermore, on Aug. 22, Trump’s attorneys filed a motion arguing that the DOJ could not be trusted and that, as a result, an impartial “special master” should be appointed to review the documents “to preserve the sanctity of executive communications and other privileged materials.”

Following Judge Aileen Cannon’s approval of Trump’s request to appoint a special master, the DOJ filed a motion to have the motion “partially stayed,” claiming that the appointment of an impartial third party would cause “irreparable harm” to both the government and the public. Giving Trump a fair shake appears to be harmful to the American people.

Biden’s Justice Department has been currently attempting to get Trump right since his inauguration, and it doesn’t appear that he is about to give up anytime soon.

According to a refute filed by Trump’s team, such risks to the public and government were greatly exaggerated. In fact, the only party in this case who could face “irreparable damage” if a special master was not appointed was Trump himself.

According to the motion, if not reviewed by a neutral third party, potentially sensitive information could be used by the government to harm Trump.

The real knockout blow came when Trump’s attorneys pointed out how the DOJ had misinterpreted the Presidential Records Act.

In summary, Trump has always had the right to keep the Mar-a-Lago documents. This fact not only renders the DOJ raid and subsequent investigation unnecessary, but it also suggests that those actions were a massive abuse of power.

It’s no surprise that they want to avoid dealing with a neutral third party.

“The [Presidential Records Act] gives any President extraordinary discretion to classify all of his or her records as Presidential or personal records, and established case law provides for very limited judicial oversight over such classification.” “The PRA also contains no provision authorizing or permitting any criminal enforcement,” Trump’s motion stated.